Process Automation Insights
This blog will focus on the challenges we face in the process industries, from operator effectiveness to safety and security to control system lifecycle concerns, and will delve into both the technology and the business aspects of these issues. Designed as a place for professionals in process industries to share ideas, we hope to create a forum for open dialog on problems, solutions, technologies and standards.  Please join the discussion.
Presented by:

 

The inspiration of integrations

May 17, 2011

The notion of a fully integrated operating environment in process industries is like apple pie and Mom: Everybody is for it.

But real-world efforts at integration have given engineers and business leaders reason to view it as a promise that’s too good to be true. Integration of disparate business, production systems and field assets has been so complex that most integration projects have extended only as far as a limited set of fieldbus technologies or loosely connected applications. Functionality and business value are limited; maintenance difficulties and disappointment are not. 

But there are a number of technology applications that now make true integration a possibility. When pulled together into a working platform, the familiar DCS evolves into something that ARC Advisory Group refers to as CPAS: Collaborative Process Automation Systems.

CPAS isn’t a really a category of controls that you can shop for and implement. Not yet, anyway. Rather, it’s what the current crop of process control platforms would be if they were successful at integrating all data and functional silos into a single workflow environment –allowing operators, engineers and managers to work in a single system. And allowing plant assets and field assets to be managed through a single interface – on-site or centrally, and even if the assets were made by dozens of manufacturers and installed at different times. 

In a 2002 report, ARC indicated “that the problems [to achieve this state] were not insurmountable, nor were they technology-constrained. In fact, most of the functionality required had already been developed with much of it commercially available – just not from a single automation supplier.”

Since then, at least some of the major automation suppliers have taken up the challenge to bring these possibilities together in next-generation DCS platforms. Doing so has meant bringing together at least 6 core technologies, (but these would occupy an entire post in and of themselves).

The point is that meaningful integration used to be a fantasy. Today it’s becoming reality.

Do you think it’s still a fantasy, or do you see advances in control systems that make true integration a real possibility?

2 Comments

  1. 1 franchesca 27 Dec
    This blog is definitely an inspiration especially to me having <a href= http://www.3jelectric.com/> automation
    control Ontario</a> for my Ontario home. Great technology!
  2. 2 Eric 05 Aug

    Someday we'll get there.  I think the key is being web-based.  I'm fairly new to process control--is web-based too idealistic or naive?  The three systems I see as not going away and therefore making sense for long term investment are: 

    SAP for robust storage and processing of business data, Honeywell for Process Control/DCS, and Microsoft SharePoint for Intranet, ECM, and easy interfaces/workflows/business information.

Comment

  1.    
     
     
      
       
Copyright ©2013 Process Automation Insights. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions